TRUE holds Advanced Advocacy Training on Open Source Evidence
On 14 and 15 September 2024, the TRUE project, in collaboration with IILAT and the Inner Temple, held a two-day bespoke advocacy training on open source evidence for senior advocates practicing at international criminal tribunals or in international cases domestically. The training was held in The Hague. We received 99 applications for 18 available places, demonstrating the interest and need for such specialised training.
The training commenced with some plenary discussions and sessions on expert evidence, case analysis, and conducting a conference with an expert witness. A panel on the particular advocacy strategies and challenges of open source evidence heard from Dearbhla Minogue (Senior Lawyer, Global Legal Action Network); Peter Haynes KC (ICC Defence counsel) and Mirjam Blom (Senior Prosecutor for International Crimes, Dutch National Public Prosecutor’s Office). Thereafter, participants practised the skills of conducting a conference with an expert witness; case analysis and examination-in-chief and cross-examination, using a fictional case study, drafted specifically for the training. Fictional expert reports were produced by the TRUE project in collaboration with experts from Bellingcat and the Starling Lab at Stanford University. Open source evidence experts (Nick Waters and George Katz from Bellingcat; Ben McCann from the Centre for Information Resilience; Koen Kluessien from the Core International Crimes Unit of the Dutch Police; Libby McAvoy from Mnemonic, and an analyst from the ICC Office of the Prosecutor) played the role of expert witnesses in the training.
The trainers at the event were some of the Inner Temple’s most experienced advocacy trainers: Rehana Azib KC (2 Temple Gardens); Grahame Aldous KC (Deka Chambers); Judge Jill Frances (Judge of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber); Mr Justice Sir Martin Griffiths (Judge of the High Court of England and Wales and Presiding Judge of Wales); Judge Joanna Korner CMG KC (ICC Judge), and Scott Matthewson (Serjeants’ Inn Chambers).
The Organising Committee for this joint training was led by Prof. Yvonne McDermott Rees from the TRUE project, Josh Kern from 9 Bedford Row Chambers/Inner Temple and Kamran Choudhry from IILAT. ICC Judge Beti Hohler, IILAT’s former Director of Training, also participated in the development and organisation of the training.The Head of Faculty for the training was TRUE Advisory Board member Judge Joanna Korner.
We are particularly grateful for the invaluable and extensive support of IILAT's Senior Associate Matas Stankevičius in the lead-up to the training and the equally invaluable support of Anouk Julien (ICC) and Anne Hausknecht (PhD student, TRUE project) on the training days themselves. A follow-up training for barristers practicing in England and Wales will be held in early 2025.
This is a fascinating initiative the fact that 99 people applied for just 18 spots really shows how much demand there is for this kind of specialised training. The combination of real experts from Bellingcat and the Starling Lab with experienced Inner Temple trainers sounds like an incredibly rich learning environment. As a law student, building skills around digital evidence and open source verification feels increasingly essential. Good student assignment help has genuinely helped me work through complex legal research more confidently. Exploring assignment writing help in Leeds while studying international criminal law helped me structure arguments around evidence admissibility much more clearly. Training programmes like this one bridge exactly the gap between academic theory and real courtroom practice.
I found this article really interesting because it highlights how important it is to verify information carefully before drawing conclusions. The practical focus on advocacy training and open-source evidence shows why critical thinking, attention to detail, and clear communication matter in legal work. As a student, I think learning how to assess sources and understand the evidence behind a claim is a valuable skill that applies to many subjects. Exploring UK's Top Science Assignment Help can also be useful for students who want to improve their research and analytical skills. Similarly, help with university assignments can support a better understanding of complex topics and academic writing. It is great to see training that encourages professionals to examine evidence thoughtfully and approach important…
A delay methodology should also take account of whether the analyst is investigating a particular event or the overall development of project delay. Understanding the difference between delay analysis methods can make this distinction easier to recognise when reviewing a programme. Event-focused techniques may trace how one identified occurrence influenced planned activities. Other methods can examine broader changes between the original programme and actual project performance. Selecting between these approaches requires consideration of the purpose of the assessment and the evidence available. The College of Contract Management offers a forensic schedule analysis course for professionals who want to build knowledge of these methodologies. Studying the subject can help learners become more confident when discussing programme analysis and time-related claims. If you…
Using an ICE CPD template can make it easier to maintain a structured record of learning and development activities. Professionals can use their records to reflect on the knowledge, skills, and experience they have developed throughout their careers.
I really like how the Dua Lipa Football Shirt brings together music culture and football-inspired fashion. Football shirts have become much more than match-day clothing, and this kind of design fits naturally into casual streetwear. It would work nicely with denim, relaxed trousers, sneakers, or layered pieces for a more fashion-focused outfit.